![]() What gives a man a value than any others organism is the MIND which we can use to control our actions. What can control a person ? A movie or the person himself !? How can Gresham blame a movie for attempting two murders ? Ben and Sarah are eighteen and nineteen years old, they are mature enough to control their actions and it's really a childish thing to blame a movie for motivating them to attempt two murder crimes one each. As we should care about this generation who's coming up to this world and help them to be better people for our country not to use them Just to get clients and make some money, Oliver here is trying to defend himself by blaming Gresham and everybody who's supporting those youngsters as it's not logical that. ![]() Oliver Stone trying to tell us that a lawyer who is Just looking for none and does not care about lives and the safety of people is not a person to trust how can you trust a person who doesn't care about people lives and about how those teenagers had been raised up are not a responsible people. 1 OFF Using logical appeal was not enough to Oliver Stone clarifying and defending himself against Gresham, therefore he used ethical appeal as Stone build up his argument talking about Gresham himself "A lawyer in search of a client could see in this an indictment of the entertainment industry and not of the teenage killers and those who reared them". When a person is good and have pure thoughts his/her actions will be good and useful for others too, if that person is not, probably his/her actions will hurt others.Īnd that is actually what happened with Ben and Sarah, both of them turned to be bad and do evil actions from what they saw In their lives not from what the movie they saw. We can tell that both of Sarah and Ben came out from a separated and different families where the love bond was not there but they did share similarities in their personalities as both of them were drinking, doing drugs and as they don't have any source of Income eventually they will need money to continue living That's what actually motivated them to attempt the crimes they did, not the movie. The whole problem comes from the inner of Ben's and Sarah's, both of them had a bad life where the family was not there nor taking are of them or watching out their teenage children. "1 500 hours of mostly violent TV programming might have slightly more effect on these two youngsters than two hours of Natural born killers? ".īen and Sarah could have never been affected by a two hours movie and motivated them to attempt a crime as millions of people saw the movie and they never heard about somebody who attempted a crime from just watching a violent movie, as Natural born killers was not and won't be the last violent movie. All teenagers around Hanna 2 the world have seen the movie and they weren't affected by It like Ben and Sarah ere the problem seems to be in Ben and Sarah, not the movie. Stone logically argued back with a valid point. ![]() ![]() Oliver Stone used a Logical appeal making the reader to think about the case by his/ her mind and trying to convince the reader and to clarify that whatever Inside the person will motivate he/she in either ways good or evil "It is likely that, whether they had seen Natural Born Killers or The Green Berets or a Tom and Jerry cartoon the night before their first crime, Ben and Sarah would have behaved In exactly the way they did".
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |